In some cases export times dropped by half. There were big gains last summer on exports when Adobe updated their code to support more than 6 cores and added GPU assist to exports. So, without further ago, here's the updated results. Since then I have added a new AMD Threadripper PC with an Nvidia RTX A6000 graphics card for our 3D rendering workstation, and added a fairly high-end Lenovo laptop PC with an i7-12800H processor and an Nvidia RTX 3070 GPU. ![]() With the new M2 MacBook Pros out, I decided to re-visit these tests and see how things are shaking out now. Adobe in particular has been putting resources into updating the performance of their applications. A lot has changed since then-new PC options, new M2 chips from Apple, OS and application updates. ![]() ![]() Last spring when the Studios were released by Apple I ran some benchmarks on performance that compared them to my M1 Max MacBook Pro and a couple of high-powered PCs we use here in my business. All of that said, the M2 Max GPU is 33% faster at Topaz than even this $1300 GPU. This is one of their best cards at the moment and again I got it for rendering, but it also performs very well for Topaz DeNoise. I also added new numbers for the 64-core AMD Threadripper I got a new 16GB Nvidia RTX 4080 graphics card. ![]() UPDATE: I corrected a number for one of the Studio Ultras you can see they are still the top performers. UPDATED: Lightroom Benchmarking: M2 and M1 Macs and PCs.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |